The Malta Independent
I am getting the impression that the US-led coalition forces that invaded Iraq are feeling trapped, with no exit or escape route in sight. It seems that they are losing by staying, unwanted and distrusted as they are by those who are keen to fill the power vacuum left by Saddam`s fall. They would also lose by leaving an unfinished job which they have little to show for in spite of the great expense and sacrifice since the invasion force was put together.
I am getting the impression that the US-led coalition forces that invaded Iraq are feeling trapped, with no exit or escape route in sight. It seems that they are losing by staying, unwanted and distrusted as they are by those who are keen to fill the power vacuum left by Saddam`s fall. They would also lose by leaving an unfinished job which they have little to show for in spite of the great expense and sacrifice since the invasion force was put together.
Somehow
there is a feeling that the US are being paid by their own coin. It seems that this is a replay of the
Afghanistan war which brought down and
disintegrated a super-power in the 1980s. Could it be that
Iraq will be the cause of disintegration
of the other super-power and the end to a uni-polar
world?
The irony of all this is that the common personality in both wars that exposed the practical limitations of military superiority is none other than Osama bin Laden.
In the 1980s, theUS – directly and through Muslim
countries, particularly Saudi
Arabia – was instrumental in building the
Muslim resistance movement which defended
Afghanistan from Soviet forces. Osama bin Laden led the Islamic fundamentalists that
economically brought the USSR to its knees in that it kept
financing an expensive and endless war in the mountainous terrain of
Afghanistan . The
USSR finally gave the country over to
the mujahidin.
Little did theUS realise
at the time that the trap into which they had forced the
USSR , while delivering the expected
weakening of the competing super-power leading to its economic and political
disintegration, would give untold strength and war experience to the most
Islamic fundamentalist grouping. These are now using their strength against the
very same force that brought them together, the
United State which, in their fundamentalist
view, is perceived as the great satan symbolising the
infidels, both Christians and Jews.
I do not know if it is reality or perception, but I am getting the impression that the fundamentalists, having got rid of theUSSR by tricking them to invade
Afghanistan , seem to have played the same trick
again by inducing America to invade
Iraq .
There is hardly any doubt that the biggest victor in the invasion ofIraq has been none other than Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda
group of Islamic fundamentalists. By forcing
America to focus on
Iraq and use most of its military
resources there, they have spared themselves the discomfort of being bombarded
and pursued in their Afghan hide-outs from where they continue to put together
their strategy of terror.
They have forced the American military to leave the Islamic holy lands ofSaudi
Arabia . They have got rid of a dictator
like Saddam who ruled Iraq as a lay state oppressing the
Shiite Islamic majority. They have brought
America ’s best military resources to
Islamic lands where they could be attacked without much risk and often with
impunity, avoiding the need to organise massive
excursions as that of 11 September. They have split Nato right down the middle. And last but not least,
they have infiltrated Iraq and obtained fertile grounds for
new recruits among those who have suffered from the US-led
occupation.
Yet for all the complexity of the situation, compounded further by revelations of Saddam-like torture by coalition forces on Iraqi prisoners – permitting the fundamentalists to project the coalition forces in the same repressive colours as distasteful Saddam – there is no exit route out of this mess.
A quick and rushed exit would be the optimum prize for which Osama & co aspire. Such an exit will give them a chance to controlIraq or create sufficient instability
there so that they have a base from where they can then set their sight on their
ultimate objective. This is nothing short of destabilisation of the Saudi Arabian ruling family and the
occupation of the holy land of Mecca and
Medina which happen to sit upon the
richest oil reserves in the world. Any disruption of oil flows from Saudi will
send the price of crude oil soaring to stratospheric levels, bringing untold
wealth to the fundamentalists which they will use for
their cause to free Palestine and annihilate the state of
Israel . These are enough ingredients to
set the whole Middle East on fire.
This grim scenario may not be as improbable as seems and it takes doses of wisdom and fortitude which are sadly missing in the current US president who seem to have been outclassed on the geo-political chessboard by resource-less religious fundamentalists.
In choosing their next president, the American voters have the responsibility to put a man in the White House who can do what is good for the development of a new world order and who understands the great responsibility which unilateralism brings.
The irony of all this is that the common personality in both wars that exposed the practical limitations of military superiority is none other than Osama bin Laden.
In the 1980s, the
Little did the
I do not know if it is reality or perception, but I am getting the impression that the fundamentalists, having got rid of the
There is hardly any doubt that the biggest victor in the invasion of
They have forced the American military to leave the Islamic holy lands of
Yet for all the complexity of the situation, compounded further by revelations of Saddam-like torture by coalition forces on Iraqi prisoners – permitting the fundamentalists to project the coalition forces in the same repressive colours as distasteful Saddam – there is no exit route out of this mess.
A quick and rushed exit would be the optimum prize for which Osama & co aspire. Such an exit will give them a chance to control
This grim scenario may not be as improbable as seems and it takes doses of wisdom and fortitude which are sadly missing in the current US president who seem to have been outclassed on the geo-political chessboard by resource-less religious fundamentalists.
In choosing their next president, the American voters have the responsibility to put a man in the White House who can do what is good for the development of a new world order and who understands the great responsibility which unilateralism brings.
No comments:
Post a Comment