The Malta Independent - Friday Wisdom
It had to
be a French President to admonish the new members of the EU from the former
Eastern communist block that they had lost a golden opportunity to remain silent
when they showed sympathy with the US position in the run-up to the war against
Iraq. I personally never found the
US position
on Iraq
convincing and had great sympathy with the French line of thought. But expecting other sovereign states to
agree or remain silent sounds to me as concentrated
arrogance.
The
Malta
government seems to have had a taste of it this week when the French government
expressed its concern about Malta ’s show of
sympathy with the EU Budget 2007-2013 proposal of the UK Presidency. The
Malta
government was quick to clarify that Malta has not
agreed to the budget as proposed but expressed the view that it offers a sound
basis for a compromise agreement at the next EU heads of state
summit.
Now of all
the countries who have a moral right to criticize the
British for proposing a budget that does not respond sufficiently to the
financial needs of new members states, the French ought to be the last. Because the reason why the British will not
budge sufficiently on their rebate to free up funds for meeting the promised
financial assistance to new member states is that
France would not
budge to a review of the subsidies paid from the EU budget to its rich
farmers.
Charles
Crawford, Britain’s ambassador to Poland, last week described EU farm subsidies
as “the most stupid, immoral, state-subsidized policy in human history,
give and take communism; EU farm
subsidies bloat rich French landowners, pump up food prices and create poverty
in Africa.” He could not have
said it better in two sentences.
Diplomatic
niceties apart, when the EU heads of states meet this week our sympathy should
be for the British who in recent weeks has moved from a rigid untouchable rebate
position unless the farm subsidies are also put on the negotiation table. Britain has now offered partial dilution of
its rebate and is expected to make further concessions in this regard during the
summit in a last ditch effort to show some fruits from its term of presidency of
the EU.
So whilst
putting pressure on the British government to make further concessions to avoid
a dangerous stalemate, especially now that Britain is comparatively much richer
than it was in 1984 when Thatcher extracted the rebate deal in the Bruges
summit, equal pressure should be put on France to accept a 2008 revision of the
farm subsidy system.
The 2008
time-line is meant to ease for French political system the pain of the
withdrawal symptoms from the EU gravy train.
By 2008 Chirac would be political history and a
new French president with a fresh mandate could be less sensitive to selfish
domestic policies in reaching a compromise to accelerate the reduction of EU
farm subsidies in line with what almost everybody else considers fair and
reasonable.
Acceptance
of the 2008 farm subsidies
revision at the EU summit is also crucially important if the Doha
round of the World Trade Organization, meeting next week in Hong Kong, is not to
flounder crushing the aspirations of alleviating poverty in Africa by opening
western markets for their agricultural produce and by not competing with them
unfairly on other international markets through price dumping of EU subsidized
produce. Failure of the WTO Doha round
will render meaningless all millennium exhortations to reduce poverty by 2015
and could give rise to resentment against the rich west which eventually will
show itself in different unpleasant forms, including
illegal immigration and terrorism.
Much will
depend on Angela Merkel who is to have her baptism of fire at the EU summit
following her succession to Gerhard Schroeder as German Chancellor. French intransigence cannot be broken by
British flexibility alone. Schroeder
somehow always toed the French line in prematurely committing himself not to
question EU farm subsidies during the budget cycle 2007-2013. Merkel need not feel committed to her
predecessor’s assured backing for the French position and without the support of
Germany it is France who could be isolated at the next summit rather
Britain. After all, new EU countries
desperately need a budget agreement even f it is does not fulfill all their
aspirations whilst Britain and
France will not
be hurt, beyond the political pride of their incumbent leaders, by failure to
reach a budget compromise.
If Merkel
plays her cards right she could broker a reasonable compromise for the EU
budget, keep the door open for a successful outcome at the
Hong
Kong meeting
of the WTO Doha round next week, and establish her credentials as a woman of
substance on the international scene.
The next
few days will decide whether 2005 was a wasted or fruitful year in international
politics and much will depend on the clash of French fries and German
sausages.
No comments:
Post a Comment