13th April 2007
The This assertion comes from the hit documentary movie An Inconvenient Truth, which offers a passionate and inspirational look at one man’s fervent crusade to halt global warming’s deadly progress in its tracks by exposing the myths and misconceptions that surround it. That man is former Vice President Al Gore, who, in the wake of the questionable defeat in the 2000
Interspersed with the
bracing facts and future predictions is the story of Gore’s personal journey:
from an idealistic college student who first saw a massive environmental crisis
looming; to a young senator facing a harrowing family tragedy that altered his
perspective, to the man who almost became president but instead returned to the
most important cause of his life – convinced that there is still time to make a
difference. Gore argues we can no longer afford to view global warming as a
political issue – rather, it is the biggest moral challenge facing our global
civilisation.
In spite of the grave importance of the issues involved and the fact that as a little island we are gravely exposed to its serious consequences, global warming is hardly on the national agenda. There must be something radically wrong with this society if we lose so much energy arguing for and against spring hunting and bird trapping, and yet we do not put global warming, or at leastMalta warming, on the national
agenda.
Either I am reading the wrong editions of the newspapers or else something unorthodox is going on. Recently there were two occasions where I had to discover about our concern with global warming and our serious risk exposure to its consequences from international rather than local sources.
Following the last EU Heads of Governments meeting inBrussels on 9 March 2007 , an agreement was signed
making it a legal obligation for all members to reduce carbon emissions by
making a substantial shift for energy generation from fossil fuels to renewable
resources. Specifically, it was agreed: “The European Council emphasises that
the EU is committed to transforming Europe into a highly energy-efficient and
low greenhouse-gas-emitting economy and decides that, until a global and
comprehensive post-2012 agreement is concluded, and without prejudice to its
position in international negotiations, the EU makes a firm independent
commitment to achieve at least a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by
2020 compared to 1990.”
As the meeting was drawing to a close, the correspondent from international news and business TV channel CNBC Europe fished out the Maltese Prime Minister from the group of Heads of Governments and asked him how a small country likeMalta could take on such an
obligation when its size permitted no economies of scale for generation of
renewable energy. The Prime Minister quite correctly argued that the obligation
was a collective one and Malta could not withhold its
consent to such a matter of life or death. He suggested that
Malta would be in a position
to buy excess renewable energy sources generated through economies of scale by
larger member countries e.g. Italy .
More recently, during BBC Radio News a feature was carried about how small islands likeMalta are exposed to the
consequences of global warming. A BBC journalist came here and interviewed a
senior official from Water Services Corporation as they went down to the
underground water galleries that serve as a reservoir for our water stock. He
explained the infrastructural achievements of these galleries built after World
War II and warned that rising sea water levels resulting from global warming
could impair the usefulness of these reservoirs as the salinity level inevitably
increases.
This could force us to depend even more on desalination for our water needs leading to more energy consumption and carbon emissions as desalination is a very energy-hungry process.
Why do our civil authorities show so much awareness to theMalta warming problem at
international level and yet have not made any visible effort to start a national
campaign of awareness to its risk and the need for energy conservation at the
capillary micro level?
A good starting point would be free cinema tickets for every family to go and see An Inconvenient Truth when it is launched.
At least it would save us the blushes of it being less popular than Mr Bean’s latest.
In spite of the grave importance of the issues involved and the fact that as a little island we are gravely exposed to its serious consequences, global warming is hardly on the national agenda. There must be something radically wrong with this society if we lose so much energy arguing for and against spring hunting and bird trapping, and yet we do not put global warming, or at least
Either I am reading the wrong editions of the newspapers or else something unorthodox is going on. Recently there were two occasions where I had to discover about our concern with global warming and our serious risk exposure to its consequences from international rather than local sources.
Following the last EU Heads of Governments meeting in
As the meeting was drawing to a close, the correspondent from international news and business TV channel CNBC Europe fished out the Maltese Prime Minister from the group of Heads of Governments and asked him how a small country like
More recently, during BBC Radio News a feature was carried about how small islands like
This could force us to depend even more on desalination for our water needs leading to more energy consumption and carbon emissions as desalination is a very energy-hungry process.
Why do our civil authorities show so much awareness to the
A good starting point would be free cinema tickets for every family to go and see An Inconvenient Truth when it is launched.
At least it would save us the blushes of it being less popular than Mr Bean’s latest.
No comments:
Post a Comment