OLAF crucified a Commissioner based on circumstantial evidence. OLAF have been very selective in their choice of circumstantial evidence as the best circumstantial evidence proving the innocence of the Commissioner is that OLAF themselves admitted that the process of the relevant directive was not in any way compromised and that none of the requests that Swedish Match were and are still lobbying for have been included in the draft directive.
There is strong circumstantial evidence that OLAF messed up this investigation. Holding a press conference emphasising their conclusions that there is unambiguous circumstantial evidence against the Commissioner without publishing their report is just against natural justice. You either publish the report and then hold a press conference where the press can ask questions based on the report and its findings or you do not publish and just shut up and let the people you reported to explain their decisions.
There is strong circumstantial evidence that the EU President wanted to abort the process of the TPD and sacrifice the Commissioner for it in the way he handled his demand for resignation which goes against the law of natural justice.
There is strong circumstantial evidence that the PN should be ashamed of having people like Silvio Zammit in its ranks, representing it as deputy mayor on the Sliema local council, in that he has not denied making atrocious demands to Swedish Match which go way way beyond any limit of fair compensation for normal lobbying services.
Circumstantial evidence, how many crimes have been committed in your name?